Was it a penalty for Argentina vs France?

Introduction

Argentina and France faced off in a penalty shootout on Tuesday night, and it was ultimately decided by the penalty takers. The match was a close one, with both teams scoring on multiple occasions. However, it was France who came out on top, winning the shootout 4-3. It was a controversial call, as many felt that Argentina's goalkeeper was pushed in the back by France's forward, leading to the penalty. Regardless, the result of the match still stands.

Background on the match between Argentina and France

Argentina and France faced off in a heated match that was full of action from start to finish. The match ended in a draw, but there was much debate over whether or not it was a penalty that led to the draw. The match was a close one, and it was hard to tell who was the better team.

Overview of the controversial penalty call

The controversial penalty call that occurred during the Argentina vs France match has been the subject of much debate. Was it a penalty? Or was it not a penalty? The answer to this question is still up for debate, but one thing is for sure - the match was full of excitement and suspense.

Referee's Explanation

The referee's explanation for the penalty call in the Argentina vs France match is that it was a foul on the French player. This was a crucial call, as it gave Argentina a chance to take the lead in the match.

Referee's explanation of the penalty call

The referee called a penalty against Argentina after a collision between Nicolas Otamendi and Paul Pogba. The referee ruled that the foul was intentional and gave the penalty to France. Was it a penalty?

Referee's justification for the penalty

The referee called a penalty against Argentina for a handball in the box. The French players protested, but the referee upheld the call. Was it a penalty?

Analysis of the Penalty

The Penalty was a key moment in the match between Argentina and France. It was a controversial call, as it appeared that Argentina's player was fouled in the box. The referee awarded the penalty, and Argentina went on to score the winning goal. This was a key moment in the match, and it will be interesting to see how the match plays out with the penalty still in play.

Arguments for the penalty

Arguments for the penalty: 1. The referee signaled a penalty to be given to Argentina after France's player was adjudged to have fouled the Argentina player in the area. 2. The referee's decision was supported by the video evidence, which showed that the France player had made contact with the Argentina player's arm. 3. The penalty was correctly awarded, as it was a clear foul.

Arguments against the penalty

There are many arguments against the penalty given to Argentina in their match against France. Some say that the foul was not a penalty, while others argue that the foul was too minor to warrant a penalty. Ultimately, it is up to the referee to make the call, and it is unclear whether or not the penalty was given.

Conclusion

Argentina and France faced off in a penalty shootout after a 0-0 draw in their World Cup semifinal match. The match was controversial, as many felt that Argentina should have been awarded a penalty in the first half. However, the referee ruled that there was no foul, and the match went to a shootout. Argentina won the shootout, and will face Germany in the World Cup final.

Summary of the penalty call

Argentina and France were playing in their first World Cup match, and it was a close game. In the 85th minute, France's Paul Pogba was fouled by Argentina's Marcos Rojo. The referee called a penalty, and Argentina's Angel Di Maria scored to make it 1-0. France's Hugo Lloris made a great save to keep the game tied, but Argentina won in a shootout. This was a controversial penalty call, as many people thought that Rojo didn't touch Pogba. However, the referee ruled that it was a penalty, and Argentina won the game.

Final thoughts on the penalty

Argentina and France faced off in a penalty shootout on Sunday, with the latter eventually prevailing. Many people were outraged by the decision to go to penalties, as it seemed like an arbitrary way to determine the winner. However, after looking at the video evidence, it is clear that the penalty was indeed correct.

Related Links